Our Blog > Uncategorized

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Monday, August 03, 2015

In BASR Partnership, William F. Pettinati, Sr., Tax Matters Partner v. United States, No. 2014-5037 (Fed. Cir. July 29, 2015), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the statute of limitations period is suspended under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 6501(c)(1) only when the IRS establishes that the taxpayer acted with the […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Saturday, August 01, 2015

On July 31, President Obama signed into law H.R. 3236, the “Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015[1],” which, among other issues, modifies the due dates for several common tax returns, overrules the Supreme Court’s Home Concrete decision, requires that additional information be reported on mortgage information statements, and requires consistent […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Wednesday, July 29, 2015

For violations involving the non-willful failure to report the existence of a reportable interest in a foreign financial account, the maximum amount of the FBAR penalty that may be assessed under Title 31, Section 5321(a)(5)(B) shall not exceed $10,000, per year, for up to six calendar years. However, no penalty shall be imposed if such […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Monday, July 27, 2015

Taxpayers who do not need to use the OVDP or the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures to file delinquent or amended tax returns to report and pay additional tax, but who: have not filed one or more required international information returns, have reasonable cause for not timely filing the information returns, are not under a civil […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2015

Taxpayers who do not need to use either the OVDP or the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures to file delinquent or amended tax returns to report and pay additional tax, but who: have not filed a required Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) (FinCEN Form 114, previously Form TD F 90-22.1), are not under […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Maintain timely, clear communications with the examining agent and the client – confirm statements in writing. Know your case and your client – verify information provided by your client. Establish relevant facts, evaluate reasonableness of assumptions or representations, apply relevant legal authorities in arriving at a conclusion supported by the law and the facts. Advise […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Friday, June 12, 2015

U.S. persons having a financial interest in or signature authority over one or more foreign financial accounts – including a bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account – having an aggregate value exceeding $10,000 at any time during 2014 is generally required by the Bank Secrecy Act to […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Tuesday, June 09, 2015

U.S. persons having a financial interest in or signature authority over a foreign financial account, including a bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account may be required by the Bank Secrecy Act to report their interest in the account to the IRS by electronically filing by June 30, 2015, […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Monday, June 08, 2015

In order to file a proper claim for refund, the practitioner should use Form 1040X (individual return), Form 1120X (corporate income return), or Form 843 (refund of taxes other than income taxes), or whatever form the Service has designated. Although informal claims for a refund have been held to be sufficient, informal claims for refund […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Friday, May 29, 2015

In Riggs v. Commissioner,[i] issued May 26, 2015, the Tax Court held that an Appeals officer did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner currently not collectible (CNC) status, for the amount the petitioner owed under IRC section 6672, the trust fund recovery penalty.  The Petitioner had timely requested a collection due process hearing […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Friday, May 29, 2015

We recently posted an article regarding the Tax Court’s recent decision in Eaton Corp v. Comm’r, No. 5576-12, where the Tax Court found the taxpayer waived attorney client privilege and work product doctrine protections when it asserted a reasonable cause/good faith penalty defense. More recently, in United States v. Sanmina Corp., No. 5:15-cv-00092 (2015 U.S. […] Read More…

Posted by Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C. Posted on Monday, May 18, 2015

In Eaton Corp. v. Comm’r, No. 5576-12, the Tax Court recently granted the government’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents where the taxpayer asserted a reasonable cause/good faith defense, finding that the taxpayer waived the privilege to protect the documents from disclosure. In Eaton, the taxpayer opposed the government’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, […] Read More…